I've always found the Postmodernists to be the most dishonest of all philosophical schools, malevolent sophists all, perhaps because they combine the deep Parisian need to be anti-bourgeois (Marxism was an edgy accessory every cool French kid had to have, akin to a leather jacket), the Parisian belief that wisdom has to be packaged in obscure jargon, and the moral certitude that all Leftists feel about their beautiful and romantic fantasy "Revolution"—that any and all words or deeds are justified if they're in service to the holy cause.
Postmodernists like to hide behind the fig leaf/sales pitch that they eschew all "meganarratives" (which may just be its own meganarrative), but I've never met or read one who doesn't quickly and inevitably end up denouncing Western culture and liberal democracy in the most florid terms, as if it our history were just a single uninterrupted hate crime and our ancestors simply brainwashed puppets.
And their great sage Foucault liked to pretend he was a second Nietzsche, spreading his Mephistophelean nihilism around in equal measures, but when he wanted to slip into the role of revolutionary, he sounded exactly like any another Maoist commissar: "When the proletariat takes power, it may be quite possible that the proletariat will exert towards the classes over which it has just triumphed, a violent, dictatorial, and even bloody power. I can’t see what objection one could make to this."
"I don't see any objection one could make" to bloodshed and massacres akin to the October Revolution etc: this is why Foucault is the patron saint of Left academia. Forget his sub-Nietzschean patter, his deceptive word clouds, he and his ilk (however branded) just wanted to throw Molotov cocktails in every direction and escape with tenure, book deals and magazine features while the rest of us live in chaos and destruction.
Post-Marxist, Neo-Marxist, postmodernism etc, these are all just different labels on the same phenomenon: post-60s intellectuals are the spoiled infants of History, who want to destroy what they could never build, and their dream of "socialist liberation" is just dispossesion sold in a bright, shiny package labeled Utopia.
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
I wonder if you are familiar with TIKHistory on You Tube? He has been investigating the underpinning meta-narrative of Fascism, National Socialism, and Marxism.
He is getting close to concluding "Immenentizing the Easchaton" is at the core of all three of these descendants of the Young Hegelians.
As James Lindsay came to realise six months ago, the "old" religion of Gnosticism is a rich vein passing through all of these Utopian religions.
I find echoes of Don Hoffman in the concept of a "God's eye view".
Hoffman claims to have somehow demonstrated through reasoned statistical insight that we don't actually experience reality as it is.
His view is that our comprehension is the way in which Natural Selection best equipped us to survive.
What we perceive as the nature of reality is merely a read out produced by stimuli and not actually what reality is comprised of.
This for me fits with the Jungian idea of Universal Consciousness and the archetype. As a human entity we share a common experience built from a common framework.
Science's claim to objectivity could
be seen to be just an approximation that we are able to share.
On top of objective reality we also experience emergent properties in our experiences and repetitive patterns. While subjective, these properties and patterns nonetheless orientate us in the world to clue us into how best to deal with situations.
Religion and art convey meta narratives that resonate with our immutable human structure.
Having followed all of this for nearly 30 years, one cannot overlook Hermeticism. It's going to be very important to educate people that everything that preceded Christianity is not "devil worship". There are many layers of flotsam and opportunism overlaid on ancient scholarly work. Identifying the Opportunism is a priority.
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
Judeo-messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only come to reinforce the old Jewish narrative . . . They are the same ideals.
The transnational, transracial, transsexual, transcultural ideals that these ideologies preach to us (beyond peoples, races, cultures) and which are the daily sustenance of our schools, in our media, in our popular culture, at our universities, and on our streets, have ended up reducing our biosymbolic identity and ethnic pride to their minimal expression.
Jewish bankers flooded Europe with Muslims and America with third-world garbage . . . Exile as punishment for those who preach sedition should be reinstated within the legal framework of the West.
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are death cults originating in the Middle East and totally alien to Europe and its peoples.
One sometimes wonders why the European left gets along so well with Muslims. Why does an often overtly anti-religious movement take the side of a fierce religiosity that seems to oppose almost everything the left has always claimed to stand for? Part of the explanation lies in the fact that Islam and Marxism have a common ideological root: Judaism.
Don Rumsfeld was right when he said, "Europe has shifted on its axis," it was the wrong side that won World War II, and it is becoming clearer every day. What has NATO done to defend Europe? Absolutely nothing . . . My enemies are not in Moscow, Damascus, Tehran, Riyadh or some ethereal Teutonic boogeyman, my enemies are in Washington, Brussels and Tel Aviv.
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
Thank you for another long essay. Really appreciate that your work is still freely available.
I have one suggestion for improvement, though. There are quite a lot of spelling mistakes throughout all of your essays, some even in the quotations. My issue with this is less about formalities but more about understanding the points you make. As a non-native speaker who tries to understand what the American export of this worldview does to my home country, it’s important to really get what you mean. This gets pretty difficult sometimes because quite often I need to guess what you meant to write.
It would be great if you could get someone to proofread your work before publishing it.
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
I think that neo Marxism has another aspect that you might be overlooking (I didn't read this article very diligently) is the application of the concept of class struggle to identity. So in addition to having the rich inherently oppressing the poor, you also have men inherently oppressing women (patriarchy), white people inherently oppressing minorities (white supremacy), gender conforming inherently oppressing gender non conforming, etc. This lays out the new set of intractable issues that underpin the privilege hierarchy and extract social and legal concessions from the society that supposedly oppresses them.
You might split this into two essays. The first part is how the postmodernist people are starting off from marxism. The second part is about cryptonormatism. I think the cryptonormatism part is more important, but people may stop reading before they get there.
Also worth looking at is the motivation for being secretive about motives, or about even having motives. Maybe this is there and I read too fast. One motive is to sound objective, even-handed, and wise. Another is that you know people will hate your goals, but you want to seduce them into support anyway. The Wokers wish to destroy Humanity. They hate civilization and their ancestors. But this, being evil, sounds evil. They need to conceal it under norms that are so popular people don't even realize they are normative, e.g., we should help the oppressed.
Isn’t this still and obstacle to the fusion of Neo-Marxism and postmodernism. At this point the eagle-eyed reader will have noticed that Neo-Marxism continues to advance it’s moral prescriptions
I've always found the Postmodernists to be the most dishonest of all philosophical schools, malevolent sophists all, perhaps because they combine the deep Parisian need to be anti-bourgeois (Marxism was an edgy accessory every cool French kid had to have, akin to a leather jacket), the Parisian belief that wisdom has to be packaged in obscure jargon, and the moral certitude that all Leftists feel about their beautiful and romantic fantasy "Revolution"—that any and all words or deeds are justified if they're in service to the holy cause.
Postmodernists like to hide behind the fig leaf/sales pitch that they eschew all "meganarratives" (which may just be its own meganarrative), but I've never met or read one who doesn't quickly and inevitably end up denouncing Western culture and liberal democracy in the most florid terms, as if it our history were just a single uninterrupted hate crime and our ancestors simply brainwashed puppets.
And their great sage Foucault liked to pretend he was a second Nietzsche, spreading his Mephistophelean nihilism around in equal measures, but when he wanted to slip into the role of revolutionary, he sounded exactly like any another Maoist commissar: "When the proletariat takes power, it may be quite possible that the proletariat will exert towards the classes over which it has just triumphed, a violent, dictatorial, and even bloody power. I can’t see what objection one could make to this."
"I don't see any objection one could make" to bloodshed and massacres akin to the October Revolution etc: this is why Foucault is the patron saint of Left academia. Forget his sub-Nietzschean patter, his deceptive word clouds, he and his ilk (however branded) just wanted to throw Molotov cocktails in every direction and escape with tenure, book deals and magazine features while the rest of us live in chaos and destruction.
Post-Marxist, Neo-Marxist, postmodernism etc, these are all just different labels on the same phenomenon: post-60s intellectuals are the spoiled infants of History, who want to destroy what they could never build, and their dream of "socialist liberation" is just dispossesion sold in a bright, shiny package labeled Utopia.
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
“Woke,” “wokeism,” “wokeness,” etc., are weasel words used to hide the truth about the Jews and the Frankfurt School.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/how-the-grift-right-gimps-for-the
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
https://nordicresistancemovement.org/what-is-cultural-marxism/
That my friend is a very useful essay, thank you.
I wonder if you are familiar with TIKHistory on You Tube? He has been investigating the underpinning meta-narrative of Fascism, National Socialism, and Marxism.
He is getting close to concluding "Immenentizing the Easchaton" is at the core of all three of these descendants of the Young Hegelians.
As James Lindsay came to realise six months ago, the "old" religion of Gnosticism is a rich vein passing through all of these Utopian religions.
I find echoes of Don Hoffman in the concept of a "God's eye view".
Hoffman claims to have somehow demonstrated through reasoned statistical insight that we don't actually experience reality as it is.
His view is that our comprehension is the way in which Natural Selection best equipped us to survive.
What we perceive as the nature of reality is merely a read out produced by stimuli and not actually what reality is comprised of.
This for me fits with the Jungian idea of Universal Consciousness and the archetype. As a human entity we share a common experience built from a common framework.
Science's claim to objectivity could
be seen to be just an approximation that we are able to share.
On top of objective reality we also experience emergent properties in our experiences and repetitive patterns. While subjective, these properties and patterns nonetheless orientate us in the world to clue us into how best to deal with situations.
Religion and art convey meta narratives that resonate with our immutable human structure.
Having followed all of this for nearly 30 years, one cannot overlook Hermeticism. It's going to be very important to educate people that everything that preceded Christianity is not "devil worship". There are many layers of flotsam and opportunism overlaid on ancient scholarly work. Identifying the Opportunism is a priority.
________________________________________________________________________________________________
“Woke,” “wokeism,” “wokeness,” etc., are weasel words used to hide the truth about the Jews and the Frankfurt School.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/how-the-grift-right-gimps-for-the
________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
https://nordicresistancemovement.org/what-is-cultural-marxism/
Judeo-messianism has been spreading its poisonous message among us for nearly two thousand years. Democratic and communist universalisms are more recent, but they have only come to reinforce the old Jewish narrative . . . They are the same ideals.
The transnational, transracial, transsexual, transcultural ideals that these ideologies preach to us (beyond peoples, races, cultures) and which are the daily sustenance of our schools, in our media, in our popular culture, at our universities, and on our streets, have ended up reducing our biosymbolic identity and ethnic pride to their minimal expression.
Jewish bankers flooded Europe with Muslims and America with third-world garbage . . . Exile as punishment for those who preach sedition should be reinstated within the legal framework of the West.
Judaism, Christianity, and Islam are death cults originating in the Middle East and totally alien to Europe and its peoples.
One sometimes wonders why the European left gets along so well with Muslims. Why does an often overtly anti-religious movement take the side of a fierce religiosity that seems to oppose almost everything the left has always claimed to stand for? Part of the explanation lies in the fact that Islam and Marxism have a common ideological root: Judaism.
Don Rumsfeld was right when he said, "Europe has shifted on its axis," it was the wrong side that won World War II, and it is becoming clearer every day. What has NATO done to defend Europe? Absolutely nothing . . . My enemies are not in Moscow, Damascus, Tehran, Riyadh or some ethereal Teutonic boogeyman, my enemies are in Washington, Brussels and Tel Aviv.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/pardonne-mon-francais-va-te-faire
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
“Woke,” “wokeism,” “wokeness,” etc., are weasel words used to hide the truth about the Jews and the Frankfurt School.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/how-the-grift-right-gimps-for-the
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
https://nordicresistancemovement.org/what-is-cultural-marxism/
Thank you for another long essay. Really appreciate that your work is still freely available.
I have one suggestion for improvement, though. There are quite a lot of spelling mistakes throughout all of your essays, some even in the quotations. My issue with this is less about formalities but more about understanding the points you make. As a non-native speaker who tries to understand what the American export of this worldview does to my home country, it’s important to really get what you mean. This gets pretty difficult sometimes because quite often I need to guess what you meant to write.
It would be great if you could get someone to proofread your work before publishing it.
Again, thank you for the work you do.
JUDEN ZETERSTEIN IS A KIKESUCKING ZIONIST ASS-WHORE . . .
"He is getting close to concluding "Immenentizing the Easchaton" is at the core of all three of these descendants of the Young Hegelians.
As James Lindsay came to realise six months ago, the "old" religion of Gnosticism is a rich vein passing through all of these Utopian religions."
Eric Vögelin is the source of this thoughts i think - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eric_Voegelin
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
“Woke,” “wokeism,” “wokeness,” etc., are weasel words used to hide the truth about the Jews and the Frankfurt School.
https://cwspangle.substack.com/p/how-the-grift-right-gimps-for-the
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
The Frankfurt School adapted Marx’s theories on revolution to include Freud’s theory of the subconscious. The Cultural Marxists’ main focus was to reshape the subconscious of Western men and women and thus create new type of person: one who would react passively to provocations of all kinds.
Cultural Marxists encourage abortion, birth control, divorce, homosexuality, “carrier women,” drugs, miscegenation, the destruction of the traditional family, and unrestricted immigration of racial foreigners into white countries. This is a reflection of what the Cultural Marxists preach: white reproduction is evil, and that which prevents white reproduction is good.
https://nordicresistancemovement.org/what-is-cultural-marxism/
I think that neo Marxism has another aspect that you might be overlooking (I didn't read this article very diligently) is the application of the concept of class struggle to identity. So in addition to having the rich inherently oppressing the poor, you also have men inherently oppressing women (patriarchy), white people inherently oppressing minorities (white supremacy), gender conforming inherently oppressing gender non conforming, etc. This lays out the new set of intractable issues that underpin the privilege hierarchy and extract social and legal concessions from the society that supposedly oppresses them.
You might split this into two essays. The first part is how the postmodernist people are starting off from marxism. The second part is about cryptonormatism. I think the cryptonormatism part is more important, but people may stop reading before they get there.
Also worth looking at is the motivation for being secretive about motives, or about even having motives. Maybe this is there and I read too fast. One motive is to sound objective, even-handed, and wise. Another is that you know people will hate your goals, but you want to seduce them into support anyway. The Wokers wish to destroy Humanity. They hate civilization and their ancestors. But this, being evil, sounds evil. They need to conceal it under norms that are so popular people don't even realize they are normative, e.g., we should help the oppressed.
Towards the end, two typos:
Isn’t this still and obstacle to the fusion of Neo-Marxism and postmodernism. At this point the eagle-eyed reader will have noticed that Neo-Marxism continues to advance it’s moral prescriptions
"